logo_red

REAL TALK ON
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS
BUSINESS & FINANCE

The Daily Alpha - 10.08.15

The Daily Alpha - 10.08.15

Garrett Baldwin



Heres today's Alternative Thinking about the NFL’s Investor Mess, Bill Gross’ Lawsuit, Goldman’s Glencore Moment and the SEC Liquidity Risk Guidelines.

“The act, quietly tucked into a bill about seaport security, was lobbied for by counsels and executives for all major sports leagues.”

So there it is…

Deadspin explains that an NFL lobbyist joined the Bush White House and worked on crafting the 2006 Internet gambling law and how it would be enforced.

The only reason that fantasy sports are called a “game of skill” is because of lobbyists--again proving that they are a semi-serious news organization with way more integrity than mainstream sports news outlets, Deadspin’s analysis on the ongoing DraftKings’ controversy has gone deeper than what CBS Sports, ESPN, and Yahoo are willing to go.

But then again, Deadspin’s revenue model doesn’t depend on all-in content and contest growth of the daily-fantasy games sector.

This story is going to get much bigger, and it’s important for three specific reasons.

First, this proves an immense amount of collusion between these gambling sites, media organizations, the NFL, team owners, and corporate influence. Big marketing partnerships are all lined up with CBS, Comcast, ESPN, Fox, Google, Time Warner, and the nation’s three largest sports leagues.

The owners of the New England Patriots and Dallas Cowboys – Robert Kraft and Jerry Jones – are both investors, and if that doesn’t make you scratch your head and make you wonder…wait… what?... keep in mind that one of the most iconic families in the NFL have long ties to gambling, even though the NFL’s stance has been immensely hypocritical toward Las Vegas.

Second, there’s a big number of angel, venture, and private equity backers that are part of this movement. How will they react as the broader customer base recognizes that these games are rigged to favor sharks. Roughly 1% of the players are taking home more than 90% of the winnings. It’s what made Conan O’Brien’s spoof SpendKings so fitting.

It’s for suckers.

Third, what does this do to the speculation about a possible IPO for either FanDuel or DraftKings. There was speculation of two huge IPOs pending… ones that would bring the world of online gambling… err… games of skill… to the broader market.

Again, there’s no problem with legalized, properly regulated gambling. But it’s comical to the point of frustration that the U.S. government decided which online gambling activities are allowed, and which aren’t.

This is the government picking winners and losers.

There’s little difference here than other lobbyist influenced creatures like the Export-Import Bank, the Green Stimulus Program of 2009, or the decision to allow certain producers to export oil across the Texas border while outlawing the broader nation from doing so.

And we now know where this started: with someone getting paid in Washington, and the NFL – whose commissioner makes more than $30 million each year and is close friends with a large investor in daily fantasy sports – the cause of this train wreck.


“Daily fantasy is not gambling.” That’s what the companies have been insisting from the very beginning, and—legally, at least—they’re correct.”

In another piece, Deadspin explains why there is no quick fix right now, particularly as current regulation suggests that this is not “gambling” and instead a game of skill.

That’s going to come into question as people start to understand how these games were legalized and left unregulated for a decade.

I am going to break into singular first person, because this is very important. Fantasy sports are not a game of skill. I’ve been playing fantasy baseball and football for 15 years, and to argue that it is not a game of chance and luck is ridiculous.

Which is why I applaud Deadspin’s recent editorial that carves up the interconnections between the NFL, league owners, news organizations, and every other person who continues to live in this fantasy world that these “online contests” require as much skill as poker.

Even worse for people who claim this is not gambling…

It walks like a duck, its quacks like a duck. It’s a duck.

And we’re fine with legal gambling, but don’t insult anyone’s intelligence in the process.

Instead of wagering dollars, you wager DraftKings Dollars, which you can exchange for actual dollars at 1-to-1 parity, just like you can for chips in a casino.

In head-to-head games, the websites take 10% of the winnings.

That’s called the juice everywhere else… But at DraftKings, it’s a processing fee.

Last year, a team of mine went 15-0 in a standard ESPN league against friends and colleagues. To argue that skill was critical is not true.

Trust me, it made no mathematical sense, and I’m 1-3 to start the year in this league in 2015.

First, in an auction draft, I figured out that many players were overvalued and undervalued according to our rules. My league members wasted most of their budgets, and I simply drafted a team of players that in a standard league would have all gone in the third, fourth, and fifth rounds. That made my hard to beat when my fourth running back (in a league that started four running backs) were among the top 20 all season.

That’s not a skill. That’s exploiting rules for personal gain.

Second, it was extremely lucky that in certain weeks, my team won despite being the eighth best performer by points during that period. Third, what is skillful about playing someone who started a player that was on the IR for most the year, or winning a game because my competitor’s quarterback took a knee on the one-yard line instead of running in for a touchdown with a minute left?

Sure, one-day fantasy is a game of skill if you’re very good at building advanced algorithms across an uneven playing field or you are skillful at using inside information on everyone else that isn’t publicly available.

But it requires an immense amount of luck on Sunday, both on your end, and on the failure of your opponents.

Poker requires way more skill and patience. You must calculate distinctive probabilities on the fly, read multiple opponents, recognize patterns of behavior at the table, put up with Phil Hellmuth’s whining, and you’re never playing the same hand over 12 hours. And even then, in an interview with Modern Trader, one former professional player laughed during an interview and said that luck was the most important factor in tournament play.

You know what takes actual skill… building a damn birdhouse.

“Gross said Pimco managing directors were "driven by a lust for power, greed, and a desire to improve their own financial position and reputation" in their ultimately successful plot to drive him out.”

Over at Finalternatives, details of Bill Gross’ lawsuit against the company he founded are spilled.

It’s been a tough stretch for Gross. His new fund at Janus underperformed the PIMCO fund that he left. Before that, his management style pushed out Mohamed El-Erian.

Now, he’s arguing that others conspired against him, even though the poor guy only made $300 million in 2014.

“The Wall Street firm plans to disseminate its quarterly earnings statement next week through its website and Twitter feed…”

Apparently Goldman Sachs’ compliance department has been infiltrated by teenagers with iPhones and a knack for sharing critical investment data in 140 characters.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Goldman Sachs will announce its earnings over Twitter next week. And while it could be the fact that the bank is moving into the 21st century, or it’s worried about recent cybersecurity problems tied to large independent presswire houses, we think it might have to do with the fact that Goldman is keeping quiet while Glencore goes through a possible “Lehman Brothers” moment.

Funny that Goldman was once so jealous of Glencore, and that Congress stopped Goldman from emulating the failing company’s business structure.

“I believe that the proposal is a welcome step in helping funds understand, assess and address their liquidity risk.”

Yesterday at the Alpha Pages, Peter Fetzer, a partner and business lawyer with Foley & Lardner, addressed what he believes chief compliance officers and boards of directors should consider in addressing risk liquidity. The recommendation is no short task. After all, he combed through more than 400 pages of a proposal by the SEC on rules for funds to manage such risks.

Check out his seven items, right here.  
















































Fintech

Getting in on the Groundfloor


Dara Albright


















Alternative Thinking on Today's Market Events

The Daily Alpha - 09.21.15


Garrett Baldwin


Assume Breach


Garrett Baldwin


Currencies

The Week Ahead for Forex


FXHQ.com


Alternative Thinking

The Daily Alpha - 09.18.15


Garrett Baldwin


Alternative Thinking on Today's Market Events

The Daily Alpha - 09.17.15


Garrett Baldwin


Alternative Thinking on Today's Market Events

The Daily Alpha - 09.16.15


Garrett Baldwin



Modern Trader

Rise of the Ethical Hacker


Garrett Baldwin





QOTD

Quotes of the Day


Garrett Baldwin



Modern Trader

Why are Hedge Funds Hiring Poker Pros?


Garrett Baldwin


Gambling and Gaming

Wall Street Casino


Garrett Baldwin


Gambling and Gaming

Investing: A Pretentious Word for Gambling?


Doug Litowitz


Gambling and Gaming

Gambling and Gaming: A Common Thread of Risk


Michael Stegemoller, Baylor University


Gambling

Where Gambling Meets Trading


Modern Trader, William Ziemba





Cybersecurity

Fire-sale: Were Three Leading Organizations Hit By A Global Cyber-Attack?


Dr. Timothy Summers and Dr. Joseph Wall


Real Talk

CNBC Demystified


Doug Litowitz


Modern Trader

False prophets


Garrett Baldwin, Illustrated by Mario Zucca


OTC

Why OTC is Back in Vogue


Edward Lopez



Modern Trader Magazine

Does Your Alma Mater?







TAP Innovation Series

Alpha Pages Innovation Series: Acorns


Garrett Baldwin


Alternative Energy

Yield Cos? More like Yield Can’ts!


Bryan Birsic


Vice Spending

April Vice Index Shows Strong Rebound


Andrew Zatlin


Disruptive Technology

Part II: Possible Hedges Against the Robot Apocalypse


Garrett Baldwin


Disruptive Technology

Part I: Possible Hedges Against the Robot Apocalypse


Garrett Baldwin


Water Investment

Rick Rule: Time to Change California’s Water Policy


Global AgInvesting


Insider Trading

Why The Second Circuit Refuses to Reconsider Its Newman Decision


Jonathan N. Halpern, Ehren M. Fournier


Futures Magazine

logo_red

ENTER YOUR EMAIL BELOW TO FOLLOW THE ALPHA PAGES

Art, Antiques & Collectibles • Forestry • Film Investments • Alternative ETFs • Wine, Spirits & Cannabis • Hard Assets • Sports & Exotic Wagering • Oil & Gas Exploration • Startup Investing • Private Equity • Treasure Recovery • Commodities • Digital Currencies • Peer-to-Peer Lending • Venture Capital • Hedge Funds • Private Real Estate • Managed Futures & CTAs • Forex & Derivatives Trading • Alternative Energy • Futures & Options